Cardiovascular disease in transgender people: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Hormone therapy in transgender people might be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). We aimed to investigate whether the risk of CVD is increased in transgender people compared with people of the same birth sex. DESIGN AND METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Google Scholar were searched until July 2022. Studies evaluating cardiovascular events in transgender women or men were included. Primary outcomes were stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), and venous thromboembolism (VTE). The risk for transgender women versus cisgender men and for transgender men versus cisgender women was analysed through random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies involving 19 893 transgender women, 14 840 transgender men, 371 547 cisgender men, and 434 700 cisgender women were included. The meta-analysis included 10 studies (79% of transgender women and 76% of transgender men). In transgender women, incidence of stroke was 1.8%, which is 1.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-1.8) times higher than in cisgender men. Incidence of MI was 1.2%, with a pooled relative risk of 1.0 (95% CI, 0.8-1.2). Venous thromboembolism incidence was 1.6%, which is 2.2 (95% CI, 1.1-4.5) times higher. Stroke occurred in 0.8% of transgender men, which is 1.3 (95% CI, 1.0-1.6) times higher compared with cisgender women. Incidence of MI was 0.6%, with a pooled relative risk of 1.7 (95% CI, 0.8-3.6). For VTE, this was 0.7%, being 1.4 (95% CI, 1.0-2.0) times higher. CONCLUSIONS: Transgender people have a 40% higher risk of CVD compared with cisgender people of the same birth sex. This emphasizes the importance of cardiovascular risk management. Future studies should assess the potential influence of socio-economic and lifestyle factors.

Time course of body composition changes in transgender adolescents during puberty suppression and sex hormone treatment.

CONTEXT: Transgender adolescents can undergo puberty suppression (PS) and subsequent gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) but little information is available on the expected rate of physical changes. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the time course of body composition changes during PS and GAHT. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Gender identity clinic. PARTICIPANTS: 380 trans boys and 168 trans girls treated with PS prior to GAHT. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Total lean- and fat mass Z-scores using birth-assigned sex as reference determined using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. RESULTS: In trans boys, lean mass Z-scores decreased (-0.32, 95%CI -0.41; -0.23) and fat mass Z-scores increased (0.31, 95%CI 0.21; 0.41) in the first year of PS and remained stable thereafter. Only during the first year of testosterone, lean mass Z-scores increased (0.92, 95%CI 0.81; 1.04) and fat mass Z-scores decreased (-0.43, 95%CI -0.57; -0.29). In trans girls, both lean and fat mass Z-scores gradually changed over three years of PS (respectively -1.13, 95%CI -1.29; -0.98 and 1.06, 95%CI 0.90; 1.23). Only in the first year of GAHT, lean mass Z-scores decreased (-0.19, 95%CI -0.36; -0.03) while fat mass Z-scores remained unchanged after three years (-0.02, 95%CI -0.20; 0.16). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to peers, trans girls experienced ongoing lean mass decrease and fat mass increase during 3 years of PS while in trans boys smaller changes were observed that stabilized after one year. A large increase in lean mass Z-scores occurred only during the first year of testosterone treatment. In trans girls, body composition changed only slightly during GAHT. This information can improve counseling about treatment effects.

Bone Mineral Density in Transgender Adolescents Treated With Puberty Suppression and Subsequent Gender-Affirming Hormones.

Importance: Bone mineral density (BMD) z scores in transgender adolescents decrease during puberty suppression with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist. Previous research found that after short-term use of gender-affirming hormones (GAH), pretreatment z scores were not restored. Long-term follow-up studies are lacking. Objective: To assess BMD after long-term GAH treatment in transgender adults who used puberty suppression in adolescence. Design, Setting, and Participants: This single-center cohort study with follow-up duration of 15 years selected participants from a database containing all people visiting a gender identity clinic at an academic hospital in the Netherlands between 1972 and December 31, 2018. Recruitment occurred from March 1, 2020, to August 31, 2021. A total of 75 participants diagnosed with gender dysphoria who had used puberty suppression before age 18 years prior to receiving at least 9 years of long-term GAH were included. Exposures: Puberty suppression with a GnRH agonist followed by GAH treatment. Main Outcomes and Measures: Lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck BMD and z scores before the start of puberty suppression, at start of GAH, and at short- and long-term follow-up. Results: Among 75 participants, 25 were assigned male at birth, and 50 were assigned female at birth. At long-term follow-up, the median (IQR) age was 28.2 (27.0-30.8) years in participants assigned male at birth and 28.2 (26.6-30.6) years in participants assigned female at birth. The median (IQR) duration of GAH treatment was 11.6 (10.1-14.7) years among those assigned male at birth and 11.9 (10.2-13.8) years among those assigned female at birth. The z scores decreased during puberty suppression. In individuals assigned male at birth, the mean (SD) z score after long-term GAH use was -1.34 (1.16; change from start of GnRH agonist: -0.87; 95% CI, -1.15 to -0.59) at the lumbar spine, -0.66 (0.75; change from start of GnRH agonist: -0.12; 95% CI, -0.31 to 0.07) at the total hip, and -0.54 (0.84; change from start of GnRH agonist: 0.01; 95% CI, -0.20 to 0.22) at the femoral neck. In individuals assigned female at birth, after long-term GAH use, the mean (SD) z score was 0.20 (1.05; change from start of GnRH agonist: 0.09; 95% CI, -0.09 to 0.27) at the lumbar spine, 0.07 (0.91; change from start of GnRH agonist: 0.10; 95% CI, -0.06 to 0.26) at the total hip, and -0.19 (0.94; change from start of GnRH agonist: -0.20; 95% CI, -0.26 to 0.06) at the femoral neck. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, after long-term use of GAH, z scores in individuals treated with puberty suppression caught up with pretreatment levels, except for the lumbar spine in participants assigned male at birth, which might have been due to low estradiol concentrations. These findings suggest that treatment with GnRH agonists followed by long-term GAH is safe with regard to bone health in transgender persons receiving testosterone, but bone health in transgender persons receiving estrogen requires extra attention and further study. Estrogen treatment should be optimized and lifestyle counseling provided to maximize bone development in individuals assigned male at birth.

The dose-dependent effect of estrogen on bone mineral density in trans girls.

OBJECTIVE: Treatment in transgender girls can consist of puberty suppression (PS) with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) followed by gender-affirming hormonal treatment (GAHT) with estrogen. Bone mineral density (BMD) Z-scores decrease during PS and remain relatively low during GAHT, possibly due to insufficient estradiol dosage. Some adolescents receive high-dose estradiol or ethinyl estradiol (EE) to limit growth allowing comparison of BMD outcomes with different dosages. DESIGN: Retrospective study. METHODS: Adolescents treated with GnRHa for ≥1 year prior to GAHT followed by treatment with a regular estradiol dose (gradually increased to 2 mg), 6 mg estradiol or 100-200 µg EE were included to evaluate height-adjusted BMD Z-scores (HAZ scores) on DXA. RESULTS: Eighty-seven adolescents were included. During 2.3 ± 0.7 years PS, lumbar spine HAZ scores decreased by 0.69 [95% confidence interval (CI) -0.82 to -0.56)]. During 2 years HT, lumbar spine HAZ scores hardly increased in the regular group (0.14, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.28, n = 59) vs 0.42 (95% CI 0.13 to 0.72) in the 6 mg group (n = 13), and 0.68 (95% CI 0.20 to 1.15) in the EE group (n = 15). Compared with the regular group, the increase with EE treatment was higher (0.54, 95% CI 0.05 to 1.04). After 2 years HT, HAZ scores approached baseline levels at start of PS in individuals treated with 6 mg or EE (difference in 6 mg group -0.20, 95% CI -0.50 to 0.09; in EE 0.17, 95% CI -0.16 to 0.50) but not in the regular group (-0.64, 95% CI -0.79 to -0.49). CONCLUSION: Higher estrogen dosage is associated with a greater increase in lumbar spine BMD Z-scores. Increasing dosage up to 2 mg estradiol is insufficient to optimize BMD and approximately 4 mg may be required for adequate serum concentrations.

The efficacy of aspirin to inhibit platelet aggregation in patients hospitalised with a severe infection: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Patients with severe infection have an increased risk of cardiovascular events. A possible underlying mechanism is inflammation-induced platelet aggregation. We investigated whether hyperaggregation occurs during infection, and whether aspirin inhibits this. In this multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial, patients hospitalised due to acute infection were randomised to receive 10 days of aspirin treatment (80 mg 1dd or 40 mg 2dd) or no intervention (1:1:1 allocation). Measurements were performed during infection (T1; days 1-3), after intervention (T2; day 14) and without infection (T3; day > 90). The primary endpoint was platelet aggregation measured by the Platelet Function Analyzer® closure time (CT), and the secondary outcomes were serum and plasma thromboxane B2 (sTxB2 and pTxB2). Fifty-four patients (28 females) were included between January 2018 and December 2020. CT was 18% (95%CI 6;32) higher at T3 compared with T1 in the control group (n = 16), whereas sTxB2 and pTxB2 did not differ. Aspirin prolonged CT with 100% (95%CI 77; 127) from T1 to T2 in the intervention group (n = 38), while it increased with only 12% (95%CI 1;25) in controls. sTxB2 decreased with 95% (95%CI - 97; - 92) from T1 to T2, while it increased in the control group. pTxB2 was not affected compared with controls. Platelet aggregation is increased during severe infection, and this can be inhibited by aspirin. Optimisation of the treatment regimen may further diminish the persisting pTxB2 levels that point towards remaining platelet activity. This trial was registered on 13 April 2017 at EudraCT (2016-004303-32).

Just as Tall on Testosterone; a Neutral to Positive Effect on Adult Height of GnRHa and Testosterone in Trans Boys.

CONTEXT: Growth is an important topic for many transgender boys. However, few studies have investigated the impact of puberty suppression (PS) and gender-affirming hormone treatment (GAHT) on growth and adult height. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of PS and GAHT on growth and adult height. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Specialized gender identity clinic. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 146 transgender boys treated with GnRH analogues and testosterone who reached adult height. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Growth, bone age (BA), adult height, and difference between adult height and predicted adult height (PAH) and midparental height. RESULTS: In those with BA ≤14 years at start (n = 61), a decrease in growth velocity and bone maturation during PS was followed by an increase during GAHT. Adult height was 172.0 ± 6.9 cm; height SD score was similar to baseline (0.1; 95% CI, -0.2 to 0.4). Adult height was 3.9 ± 6.0 cm above midparental height and 3.0 ± 3.6 cm above PAH at start of PS. A younger BA at start PS was associated with an adult height significantly further above PAH. CONCLUSION: During PS, growth decelerated followed by an acceleration during GAHT. Although adult height SD score was similar to baseline, adult height was taller than predicted based on BA at baseline, especially in those who started treatment at a younger BA. It is reassuring that PS and GAHT do not have a negative impact on adult height in transgender boys and might even lead to a slightly taller adult height, especially in those who start at a younger age.

Continuation of gender-affirming hormones in transgender people starting puberty suppression in adolescence: a cohort study in the Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: In the Netherlands, treatment with puberty suppression is available to transgender adolescents younger than age 18 years. When gender dysphoria persists testosterone or oestradiol can be added as gender-affirming hormones in young people who go on to transition. We investigated the proportion of people who continued gender-affirming hormone treatment at follow-up after having started puberty suppression and gender-affirming hormone treatment in adolescence. METHODS: In this cohort study, we used data from the Amsterdam Cohort of Gender dysphoria (ACOG), which included people who visited the gender identity clinic of the Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Medisch Centrum, Netherlands, for gender dysphoria. People with disorders of sex development were not included in the ACOG. We included people who started medical treatment in adolescence with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) to suppress puberty before the age of 18 years and used GnRHa for a minimum duration of 3 months before addition of gender-affirming hormones. We linked this data to a nationwide prescription registry supplied by Statistics Netherlands (Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek) to check for a prescription for gender-affirming hormones at follow-up. The main outcome of this study was a prescription for gender-affirming hormones at the end of data collection (Dec 31, 2018). Data were analysed using Cox regression to identify possible determinants associated with a higher risk of stopping gender-affirming hormone treatment. FINDINGS: 720 people were included, of whom 220 (31%) were assigned male at birth and 500 (69%) were assigned female at birth. At the start of GnRHa treatment, the median age was 14·1 (IQR 13·0-16·3) years for people assigned male at birth and 16·0 (14·1-16·9) years for people assigned female at birth. Median age at end of data collection was 20·2 (17·9-24·8) years for people assigned male at birth and 19·2 (17·8-22·0) years for those assigned female at birth. 704 (98%) people who had started gender-affirming medical treatment in adolescence continued to use gender-affirming hormones at follow-up. Age at first visit, year of first visit, age and puberty stage at start of GnRHa treatment, age at start of gender-affirming hormone treatment, year of start of gender-affirming hormone treatment, and gonadectomy were not associated with discontinuing gender-affirming hormones. INTERPRETATION: Most participants who started gender-affirming hormones in adolescence continued this treatment into adulthood. The continuation of treatment is reassuring considering the worries that people who started treatment in adolescence might discontinue gender-affirming treatment. FUNDING: None.

Transgender Girls Grow Tall: Adult Height Is Unaffected by GnRH Analogue and Estradiol Treatment.

CONTEXT: Transgender adolescents can receive gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues (GnRH) and gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT), but little is known about effects on growth and adult height. This is of interest since height differs between sexes and some transgender girls wish to limit their growth. OBJECTIVE: This work aims to investigate the effects of GnRHa and GAHT on growth, and the efficacy of growth-reductive treatment. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study took place at a specialized tertiary gender clinic. A total of 161 transgender girls were treated with GnRHa and estradiol at a regular dose (2 mg) or high growth-reductive doses of estradiol (6 mg) or ethinyl estradiol (EE, 100-200 µg). Main outcome measures included growth, adult height, and the difference from predicted adult height (PAH) and target height. RESULTS: Growth velocity and bone maturation decreased during GnRHa, but increased during GAHT. Adult height after regular-dose treatment was 180.4 ±â€…5.6 cm, which was 1.5 cm below PAH at the start GnRHa (95% CI, 0.2 cm to 2.7 cm), and close to target height (-1.1 cm; 95% CI, -2.5 cm to 0.3 cm). Compared to regular-dose treatment, high-dose estradiol and EE reduced adult height by 0.9 cm (95% CI, -0.9 cm to 2.8 cm) and 3.0 cm (95% CI, 0.2 cm to 5.8 cm), respectively. CONCLUSION: Growth decelerated during GnRHa and accelerated during GAHT. After regular-dose treatment, adult height was slightly lower than predicted at start of GnRHa, likely due to systematic overestimation of PAH as described in boys from the general population, but not significantly different from target height. High-dose EE resulted in greater reduction of adult height than high-dose estradiol, but this needs to be weighed against possible adverse effects.

Erythrocytosis in a Large Cohort of Trans Men Using Testosterone: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study on Prevalence, Determinants, and Exposure Years.

CONTEXT: Erythrocytosis is a known side effect of testosterone therapy that can increase the risk of thromboembolic events. OBJECTIVES: To study the prevalence and determinants in the development of erythrocytosis in trans men using testosterone. METHODS: A 20-year follow-up study in adult trans men who started testosterone therapy and had monitoring of hematocrit at our center (n = 1073). RESULTS: Erythrocytosis occurred in 11% (hematocrit > 0.50 L/L), 3.7% (hematocrit > 0.52 L/L), and 0.5% (hematocrit > 0.54 L/L) of trans men. Tobacco use (odds ratio [OR] 2.2; 95% CI, 1.6-3.3), long-acting undecanoate injections (OR 2.9; 95% CI, 1.7-5.0), age at initiation of hormone therapy (OR 5.9; 95% CI, 2.8-12.3), body mass index (BMI) (OR 3.7; 95% CI, 2.2-6.2), and pulmonary conditions associated with erythrocytosis and polycythemia vera (OR 2.5; 95% CI, 1.4-4.4) were associated with hematocrit > 0.50 L/L. In the first year of testosterone therapy hematocrit increased most: 0.39 L/L at baseline to 0.45 L/L after 1 year. Although there was only a slight continuation of this increase in the following 20 years, the probability of developing erythrocytosis still increased (10% after 1 year, 38% after 10 years). CONCLUSION: Erythrocytosis occurs in trans men using testosterone. The largest increase in hematocrit was seen in the first year, but also after the first years a substantial number of people present with hematocrit > 0.50 L/L. A reasonable first step in the care for trans men with erythrocytosis while on testosterone is to advise them to quit smoking, to switch to a transdermal administration route, and if BMI is high, to lose weight.

Change in grip strength in trans people and its association with lean body mass and bone density.

OBJECTIVE: Gender-affirming hormonal treatment (HT) in trans people changes physical appearance. Muscle mass and strength are important aspects of physical appearance, but few data exist on the effect of HT on grip strength and muscle mass. This study aimed to investigate the change in grip strength in trans people during the first year of HT and to study the possible determinants of this change and the associations between changes in grip strength, lean body mass and bone mineral density (BMD). DESIGN AND METHODS: A multicenter, prospective study was performed, including 249 transwomen and 278 transmen. Grip strength, lean body mass and BMD were measured at baseline and after 1 year. RESULTS: After 1 year of HT, grip strength decreased with -1.8 kg (95% CI -2.6; -1.0) in transwomen and increased with +6.1 kg (95% CI +5.5; +6.7) in transmen. No differences in grip strength change was found between age groups, BMI groups, hormonal administration routes or hormone concentrations. In transmen, increase in grip strength was associated with increase in lean body mass (per kg increase in grip strength: +0.010 kg, 95% CI +0.003; +0.017), while this was not found in transwomen (per kg increase in grip strength: +0.004 kg, 95% CI -0.000; +0.009). Change in grip strength was not associated with change in BMD in transwomen and transmen. CONCLUSIONS: After 1 year of HT, grip strength decreased in transwomen, and increased in transmen. In transmen only, change in grip strength was associated with change in lean body mass.

Breast Development in Transwomen After 1 Year of Cross-Sex Hormone Therapy: Results of a Prospective Multicenter Study.

Context: Breast development is a key feature of feminization and therefore important to transwomen (male-to-female transgender persons). It is not exactly known when breast development starts after initiating cross-sex hormone therapy (CHT) and how much growth may be expected. Objective: To investigate breast development in transwomen during their first year of CHT and whether clinical or laboratory parameters predict breast development. Design: This study was performed as part of the European Network for the Investigation of Gender Incongruence, which is a prospective multicenter cohort study. Setting: Gender clinics in Amsterdam, Ghent, and Florence. Participants: Transwomen who completed the first year of CHT (n = 229). Intervention: CHT. Main Outcome Measures: Breast development in centimeter and cup size. Results: The median age of the included transwomen was 28 years (range, 18 to 69). Mean breast-chest difference increased to 7.9 ± 3.1 cm after 1 year of CHT, mainly resulting in less than an AAA cup size (48.7%). Main breast development occurred in the first 6 months of therapy. Serum estradiol levels did not predict breast development after 1 year of CHT (first quartile, 3.6 cm [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.7 to 4.5], second quartile, 3.2 cm [95% CI, 2.3 to 4.2], third quartile, 4.4 cm [95% CI, 3.5 to 5.3], and fourth quartile, 3.6 cm [95% CI, 2.7 to 4.5]). Conclusion: This study shows that, after 1 year of CHT, breast development is modest and occurs primarily in the first 6 months. No clinical or laboratory parameters were found that predict breast development.